|
Point
Break
by,
Greg Hutchins
With
the Starbury Saga reaching its closing act, news of
the controversial point guard's indefinite suspension
comes as no surprise. Donnie Walsh's decision to banish
Stephon Marbury from the sidelines was a necessary move,
albeit several weeks late. Marbury and his union attorney
have pressed for a buyout of the $21.9MM he's owed,
yet Walsh and Marbury have failed to reach a fair and
equitable agreement. Reportedly, the two sides are $3MM
apart from a settlement.
To
Marbury's credit, he had a highly productive and drama-free
training camp/preseason. His willingness to come off
the bench for Chris Duhon despite heading into a contract
year was viewed as a sign of concession and maturation.
Then, unbenounced to most members of the organization,
Mike D'Antoni pulled the plug on Starbury at the start
of the regular season. D'Antoni's issues with Marbury
in 2003 (as interim Suns head coach) led the new Knicks
head man to dismiss the pride of Coney Island for a
second time. In a recent interview with Marc Berman
of the New York Post, Marbury was quoted as saying:
"Mike had no intentions of me playing basketball
here. He put in Gallinari, whose back is messed up and
didn't participate at all in training camp ahead of
me. He was sticking it to me."
Mike
D'Antoni has been a breath of fresh air for a Knicks
organization that has been mired in a fog of porous
play since 2002. Although they are undermanned and undersized
nightly, D'Antoni's team has shown they are committed
to playing a better brand of basketball and should eclipse
last season's win total. Surely having Marbury on the
floor would help a depleted team, but the rift between
player and coach is miles apart.
Regardless
of how D'Antoni approached Marbury about the option
to play following Walsh's cap-clearing trades, the notion
that the head coach would reverse field on his decision
was baffling. Granted the team is shorthanded, but did
he truly expect Marbury to agree to a 35 minute cameo
performance after riding the pine and sitting out practice
all season? D'Antoni's subsequent starting shooting
guard offer for the rest of the season was clearly made
out of desperation given the questions around Cuttino
Mobley's heart condition and an ailing backcourt. While
I've never been much of a Marbury apologist, I tend
to side with the player in this case. Walsh's assertion
that a player "should render professional services
when called upon" is valid, but placing an All-Star
caliber athlete on the inactive list because you don't
particularly care for him is pure tomfoolery.
At
this stage of the season, Walsh must waive Marbury for
the sake of the team. With one-third of the roster out
injured since the start of the year (including a lottery
pick dubbed the European LeBron James by several pre-draft
scouting websites), Walsh has to create a roster spot
to import a healthy body.
Rumors
have circulated that team owner James Dolan has instructed
Walsh to refrain from offering Marbury a buyout until
January for accounting purposes. While Cablevision shareholders
would be happy with that decision, Knicks fans will
have little to smile about other than thoughts of King
James sporting a blue and orange # 23 jersey in 2010.
One can only hope that Marbury's departure will signal
a resurgence for the franchise as it did for the New
Jersey Nets and Phoenix Suns respectively.
Greg
Hutchins is the Senior Columnist for The Garden Grasp.
Questions or comments about the article may be e-mailed
to gardengrasp@gmail.com

|